Current:Home > reviewsOscar Pistorius and the Valentine’s killing of Reeva Steenkamp. What happened that night? -EquityWise
Oscar Pistorius and the Valentine’s killing of Reeva Steenkamp. What happened that night?
View
Date:2025-04-16 15:44:49
CAPE TOWN, South Africa (AP) — Here’s what to know about the night South African Olympic runner Oscar Pistorius shot his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp more than a decade ago in a Valentine’s Day killing that jolted the world and shattered the image of a sports superstar.
Pistorius, a world-famous double-amputee sprinter who competed on carbon-fiber blades at the 2012 London Olympics, was released on parole Friday having served nearly nine years in prison for murder.
He has always maintained he shot Steenkamp in a tragic mistake in the predawn hours of Feb. 14, 2013, thinking she was a dangerous intruder in his home in the South African capital, Pretoria. Prosecutors said he killed Steenkamp, a 29-year-old model and reality TV star, intentionally during a late-night argument and then made up the intruder story.
A judge initially accepted Pistorius’ story but South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal overturned a lesser manslaughter conviction against him after an appeal by prosecutors and found him guilty of murder.
FOUR SHOTS
Pistorius did not deny that he shot four times through a locked toilet cubicle door in his home with his licensed 9 mm pistol, hitting Steenkamp in the head, arm and hip. But the reason for Pistorius opening fire formed the central part of his dramatic 2014 murder trial, which lasted seven months and was broadcast live across the world.
He testified that he heard a noise in the bathroom in the middle of the night and believed there was an intruder in his home. He said he grabbed his gun from under the bed where he had been sleeping next to Steenkamp and went to the bathroom.
When he heard a noise from the cubicle, he fired through the door in what he said he thought was self-defense. Steenkamp was hit on the other side of the door.
PISTORIUS’ STORY
Pistorius’ story was attacked by prosecutors, who asked how he did not first check on where Steenkamp was if he was so concerned about a dangerous intruder. They said he even had to walk past Steenkamp’s side of the bed to get to the bathroom.
A mourner carries a program at the funeral for Reeva Steenkamp, in Port Elizabeth, South Africa on Feb. 19, 2013. (AP Photo/Schalk van Zuydam, File)
Pistorius said he had woken up and had gone out onto a balcony to retrieve a fan when he heard the noise from the bathroom and was scared and panicked. He said he rushed to get his gun and presumed Steenkamp was still in bed.
Once he saw Steenkamp was not in bed after the shooting, he realized she might be the person in the toilet, he testified. Pistorius said he had to break down the locked toilet door with a cricket bat in a vain effort to save her.
PROSTHETIC LEGS ON OR NOT?
Prosecutors alleged at the start of the trial that Pistorius had taken the time to put on his prosthetic legs before shooting Steenkamp. They said it showed premeditation and he wouldn’t have done that if he was reacting suddenly to what he thought was a dangerous intruder.
Oscar Pistorius weeps as he listens to evidence by a pathologist in court in Pretoria, South Africa April 7 2014. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe, Pool, File)
Pistorius’ defense lawyers showed the angle of bullet holes in the toilet door — which was brought into court as an exhibit — proved he fired the shots while standing on his stumps and prosecutors later conceded Pistorius did fire the deadly shots while he did not have his prosthetic legs on. Pistorius’ lawyers even had him walk around the courtroom without his prosthetic legs, hoping to show he was unstable and vulnerable without them and how it might explain his panicked reaction to a possible threat in his home.
THE FIGHT
The basis of the prosecution’s case was that the couple, who had only been dating for a few months, had a late-night argument and Steenkamp fled to the bathroom in fear of an angry Pistorius. Neighbors testified that they heard shouting and screams coming from Pistorius’ villa around 3 a.m. before loud bangs. Prosecutors said it showed the couple were arguing before the gunshots.
People pprotest against Oscar Pistorius outside the high court in Pretoria, South Africa, Thursday, Sept. 11, 2014 during the murder trial of Oscar Pistorius. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe, File)
Pistorius’ lawyers said the screams came from him after he realized what he had done, and the bangs were him hitting the door with the cricket bat to get to Steenkamp. The manager of the gated community where Pistorius lived and his daughter were the first people on the scene after the shooting. The manager testified Pistorius was crying, screaming and praying while carrying Steenkamp’s bloodied body down the stairs when they arrived.
THE FINAL VERDICT
The Supreme Court of Appeal ultimately convicted Pistorius of murder under a specific South African legal principle because he acted with such recklessness when he shot through the door and should have known someone would have been killed without justification. It is comparable to a third-degree murder conviction and Pistorius was sentenced to 13 years and five months in prison.
But the final verdict did not definitively say if Pistorius knew he was shooting specifically at Steenkamp and intended to kill her and that question — the very heart of the case — may never be fully answered.
___
More AP coverage of Oscar Pistorius: https://apnews.com/hub/oscar-pistorius
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Dozens indicted on Georgia racketeering charges related to ‘Stop Cop City’ movement appear in court
- Live updates | Netanyahu says Israel will have ‘overall security responsibility’ in Gaza after war
- Trump clashes with judge, defends business record in testimony at New York fraud trial
- Southern California rocked by series of earthquakes: Is a bigger one brewing?
- Highland Park suspected shooter's father pleads guilty to reckless conduct
- The Supreme Court takes up a case that again tests the limits of gun rights
- Video shows forklift suspending car 20 feet in air to stop theft suspect at Ohio car lot
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Australian central bank lifts benchmark cash rate to 4.35% with 13th hike
Ranking
- Drones warned New York City residents about storm flooding. The Spanish translation was no bueno
- Why Pregnant Kailyn Lowry Is “Hesitant” to Get Engaged to Elijah Scott
- Starbucks increases US hourly wages and adds other benefits for non-union workers
- Prince William cheers on 15 finalists of Earthshot Prize ahead of awards ceremony
- Connie Chiume, Black Panther Actress, Dead at 72: Lupita Nyong'o and More Pay Tribute
- EU envoy in surprise visit to Kosovo to push for further steps in normalization talks with Serbia
- A 17-year-old boy wanted in the killing of a passenger resting on a Seattle bus turns himself in
- Ex-Philadelphia labor leader on trial on federal charges of embezzling from union
Recommendation
Organizers cancel Taylor Swift concerts in Vienna over fears of an attack
Protests turn ugly as pressure mounts on Spain’s acting government for amnesty talks with Catalans
Video shows forklift suspending car 20 feet in air to stop theft suspect at Ohio car lot
Youngkin and NAACP spar over felony voting rights ahead of decisive Virginia elections
Blake Lively’s Inner Circle Shares Rare Insight on Her Life as a Mom to 4 Kids
Alabama playoff-bound? Now or never for Penn State? Week 10 college football overreactions
Megan Fox Describes Abusive Relationship in Gut-Wrenching Book of Poems
Backstage with the Fugees: Pras on his hip-hop legacy as he awaits sentencing in conspiracy case