Current:Home > NewsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -EquityWise
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-18 00:29:20
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- How breaking emerged from battles in the burning Bronx to the Paris Olympics stage
- Defeat of Florida increases buyout of Arkansas coach Sam Pittman by more than $5 million
- French power supplier says technician killed as it battles damage from Storm Ciarán
- Why does Dolly Parton's 'I Will Always Love You' end 'Priscilla,' about Elvis' ex-wife?
- NCAA hits former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh with suspension, show-cause for recruiting violations
- Moroccan archaeologists unearth new ruins at Chellah, a tourism-friendly ancient port near Rabat
- Off-duty Los Angeles police officer, passenger killed by suspected drunken driver, authorities say
- Chiefs want to be ‘world’s team’ by going global with star power and Super Bowl success
- Former Milwaukee hotel workers charged with murder after video shows them holding down Black man
- Supporters celebrate opening of Gay Games in Hong Kong, first in Asia, despite lawmakers’ opposition
Ranking
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Would Summer House's Lindsay Hubbard Ever Get Back With Carl Radke After Split? She Says...
- Chiefs vs. Dolphins highlights: Catch up on the big moments from KC's win in Germany
- Record-breaking Storm Ciarán kills at least 5 in Italy, trapping residents and overturning cars: A wave of water bombs
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Leroy Stover, Birmingham’s first Black police officer, dies at 90
- LSU vs. Alabama: The best plays and biggest moments from Crimson Tide's win over Tigers
- Drew Barrymore gets surprise proposal from comedian Pauly Shore on talk show
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Offshore wind projects face economic storm. Cancellations jeopardize Biden clean energy goals
Her son ended his life with a gun. Driven to her knees, she found hope.
China Premier Li seeks to bolster his country’s economic outlook at the Shanghai export fair
Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
A glance at some of Nepal’s deadliest earthquakes
How Midwest Landowners Helped to Derail One of the Biggest CO2 Pipelines Ever Proposed
Israel tightens encirclement of Gaza City as Blinken urges more civilian protection — or else there will be no partners for peace